Built first for drug and device litigation.
Firms on both sides, and the experts who work with them, need to know what was known about a drug’s or device’s risks, and when.
Litigation, both sides, and experts
What was known, and when, for a case.
Plaintiff firms
A question they bring“Which drugs are most often reported with this injury, and did their labels warn before my client started in March 2019?”
What comes backThe candidate drugs, the label in force on that date, and when each warning appeared.
Defense teams
A question they bring“What did FDA’s reviewers say about this risk at approval, and did the company later propose a warning FDA declined?”
What comes backThe reviewers’ passages, the company’s submissions and FDA’s response, quoted and dated.
Expert and consulting firms
A question they bring“Which terms make up ‘eye damage’, and which query and data version sit behind each number?”
What comes backCited tables, and the term list, the method and the data version behind every figure.
The same record, other teams.
The same cited record serves pharma and device legal and safety teams, product-liability insurers, litigation funders and due-diligence teams.
One record for both sides
Kelsey takes no side. Both sides see the same evidence and the same sources.
Kelsey assembles evidence. It does not give legal advice.
Working product. Test links upon request.
Tell us your firm, your role and the question you would like answered.